Posted by mohana1 on January 5, 2009
First of all, we can probably all agree that decentralized training administration is inefficient.
It becomes a problem when there are multiple administrators in multiple groups completing the same tasks or transactions, but doing it in multiple ways. Various groups within an organization have differences in their processes and procedures, such as registration needs or course description details. But often these variations are driven by lack of bandwidth or minimal training.
Take as an example the process of uploading courses to an LMS. If an organization has various people doing this, it’s common to see different administrators using different course-naming schemes and course descriptions.
So, centralization of learning support and learning operations management is critical, which goes without saying.
On the flipside, it’s not a good idea to develop inflexible processes that don’t adapt to the needs of your customers, the business units. Be careful about trying to eliminate customized support that they’ve grown accustomed to. Dissatisfaction quickly rises when executives feel their needs and interests are not heard, considered, and acted upon.
Establishing a decentralized approach to customer training support is that business units have enough control over employee learning and can tailor all aspects of learning to the specific needs of their employees. Long term, you get ever closer to the elusive goal of aligning learning with business objectives.
To learn more about the concept of Centralized Services and Decentralized Processes, download the white paper.
For more information on this topic and the nine ways to trim operational expense, please download the recent webinar or read our white paper, Eliminate Waste and Reap the Rewards: Nine Ways to Trim Operational Expenses to Fund Strategic Learning, both available at http://www.trainingefficiency.com/.
If your organization wants to increase the training efficiency in terms of your learning technology or training processes, contact us.
For more information log on to www.expertus.com
www.trainingefficiency.com
Posted in training administration | Tagged: Content conversion, Content development, learning architecture, Learning BPO, Learning business solutions, Learning consulting, Learning Measurement, Learning Operations management, Learning Strategy, learning technology integration, LMS customization, LMS implementation, LMS integration, LMS vendor selection, training administration, training application management, Training assessment, training efficiency, training outsourcing, training reporting | Leave a Comment »
Posted by mohana1 on November 3, 2008
When you consolidate and reduce the number of your company’s learning systems, a cumulative positive effect is spread across the entire training organization.
There will be fewer system support requirements, less maintenance, fewer patches, fewer resource requirements, fixes and upgrades. In addition, you’ll need fewer people with technology skill sets, which helps to reduce support costs. The bonus benefit is your reporting will become easier, which will lead to better learning measurements.
In our experience, there are two main challenges to the consolidation and centralization of learning technology:
1. Deciding what to do with legacy data
2. How to meet the functional requirements of varying business units
With regard to legacy data, there are several options. Assuming you have the ability to keep your legacy systems, you can migrate users to new systems and build data integration into your stable legacy systems. Users can still access the data, but you won’t have to go through a big data migration effort, which can be time consuming and expensive.
If you have to go through a data migration effort, which is usually accompanied by a significant amount of data clean up, it makes sense to conduct a data audit and do some systems analysis up front.
The second big challenge is how to meet the functional requirements of various groups across your organization. More and more training departments are leveraging newer technologies and approaches by building LMS functionality OUTSIDE of their LMS, in the form of portals and widgets. This approach allows you to customize to the needs of those diverse business units and significantly improve the user experience.
For more tips, check out our recent webinar recording or read our white paper, Eliminate Waste and Reap the Rewards: Nine Ways to Trim Operational Expenses to Fund Strategic Learning, both available at www.TrainingEfficiency.com.
If your organization is considering an LMS consolidation or if you’re interested in increasing the efficiency of your learning technology infrastructure, contact us.
For more information log on to www.expertus.com
www.trainingefficiency.com
Posted in Learning consulting | Tagged: consolidate learning technologies, customer training, Learning BPO, Learning management systems, learning technologies, learning technology, learning technology integration, LMS, LMS integration, LMS pain points, LMS problems, smart reports, Talent management, training administration, training efficiency, training outsourcing | 2 Comments »
